Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8600 - 210 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $175.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900 - $0.93 vs $2.18 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
42.6605504587156%
Price, $
$458
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348675 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
188
89.52380952380953%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1456
58.87585928022645%
Multi-Core
5027
38.53879178166207%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |