Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1295 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 212 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $210.0 vs $350.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - $1.15 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
69.27710843373494%
Price, $
$350.99
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348548 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
183
86.32075471698113%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1245
48.9771833202203%
Multi-Core
6113
41.07922854646865%
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |