Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3800X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1178 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 3800X - 136 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $284.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900K - $2.54 vs $3.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.85/FPS
65%
Price, $
$522.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280358 minutes ago
Buy for $284 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |