Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400 - 139 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $160.91 vs $522.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900K - $1.33 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.76/FPS
35.37234042553192%
Price, $
$522.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348537 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
87.05035971223022%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1384
46.53665097511769%
Multi-Core
4795
23.798888227119317%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |