Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1488 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 164 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $531.86 vs $1075.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $3.24 vs $8.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$531.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351198 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
125
76.21951219512195%
Value, $/FPS
$8.6/FPS
37.674418604651166%
Price, $
$1075
49%
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1263
42.48234106962664%
Multi-Core
8338
41.48052335704691%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |