Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3733 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 98% better in Starfield than FX-4300 - 87 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
50.57471264367817%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |