Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 7 3800XT on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 919 days newer than Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - 225 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 105 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
194
86.22222222222223%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$406.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $406.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1758
56.61835748792271%
Multi-Core
8481
38.84486786057803%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |