Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 5 7645HX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than Ryzen 5 7645HX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 7645HX - 232 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2678
88.67549668874172%
Multi-Core
11781
64.48275862068965%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
