Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7940X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1852 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $425.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-13900K - $2.4 vs $2.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-7940X - 214 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7940X - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280311 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
98%
Price, $
$522.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |