Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i9-8950HK on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1738 days newer than Core i9-8950HK.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-8950HK - 167 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-8950HK - 32 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-8950HK
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-8950HK
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1362
49.89010989010989%
Multi-Core
4890
28.39886172251583%
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
