Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 191 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $155.0 vs $372.84
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900 - $0.86 vs $1.95 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
44.1025641025641%
Price, $
$372.84
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
94.76439790575915%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
71.50837988826815%
Multi-Core
4841
67.1987784564131%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |