Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 798 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in War Thunder than Core i9-9900KF - 215 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $113.0 vs $359.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900KF - $0.53 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
197
91.62790697674419%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
29.120879120879124%
Price, $
$359
31%
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349095 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |