Buy on Amazon
$595
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 3328 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-750 - 220 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $75.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-9920X - $0.38 vs $2.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
14.074074074074073%
Price, $
$595
12%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC6)
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349820 minutes ago
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
195
88.63636363636364%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
30.219391365888182%
Multi-Core
1200
12.709171785638636%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
