Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1439 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9920X - 134 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $373.59 vs $595.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9920X - $2.79 vs $5.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
107
79.8507462686567%
Value, $/FPS
$5.56/FPS
50.17985611510791%
Price, $
$595
62%
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350768 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$373.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $373.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1413
49.75352112676056%
Multi-Core
9442
53.614218386235876%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |