Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Starfield than Core i9-9940X - 67 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $113.0 vs $870.7
- Up to 89% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9940X - $1.69 vs $14.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
59
88.05970149253731%
Value, $/FPS
$14.76/FPS
11.449864498644986%
Price, $
$870.7
12%
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349461 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |