Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 654 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i5-7600 - 59 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $99.0 vs $870.7
- Up to 88% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9940X - $1.71 vs $14.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.76/FPS
11.585365853658537%
Price, $
$870.7
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
58
98.30508474576271%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1373
94.10555174777244%
Multi-Core
3812
35.51332215390348%
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |