Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1538 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9940X - 157 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $567.98 vs $870.7
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9940X - $3.62 vs $6.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
84.07643312101911%
Value, $/FPS
$6.6/FPS
54.84848484848486%
Price, $
$870.7
65%
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351237 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$567.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1459
53.75829034635225%
Multi-Core
10734
65.34761962741995%
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |