Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 415 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-4300 - $37.49 vs $48.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4300 - $0.33 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G630 - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
115
99.13793103448276%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358217 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
80.48780487804879%
Price, $
$48.02
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |