Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Pentium P6200 vs Ryzen 7 8840U

Pentium P6200 vs Ryzen 7 8840U: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Availability

No items available

Availability

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 4819 days newer than Pentium P6200.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

  • Performs up to 135% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Pentium P6200 - 141 vs 60 FPS
  • Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Pentium P6200 - 28 vs 35 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 16 vs 2 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Assassin's Creed Mirage.

Assassin's Creed Mirage

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


FPS

60

42.5531914893617%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo
Ryzen 7 8840U

Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023


FPS

141

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

FPS Winner

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo
Ryzen 7 8840U

Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


Single-Core

283

11.301916932907348%

Multi-Core

475

5.419899589228662%

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo
Ryzen 7 8840U

Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023


Single-Core

2504

100%

Multi-Core

8764

100%

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo

Intel Pentium P6200

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

Sep 26th, 2010Release Date
Dec 6th, 2023
PentiumCollectionRyzen 7
ArrandaleCodenameNot Available
Intel Socket G1SocketAMD Socket FP8
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.3 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.1 GHz
35 WTDP
28 W
32 nmProcess Size
4 nm
16.0xMultiplier
33.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.