Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2105 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Xeon E-2176M - 84 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 32 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
