Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E-2224 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1316 days newer than Xeon E-2224.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2224
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E-2224 - 134 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2224 - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E-2224
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2224 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 71 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
