Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E-2314 - 207 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Single-Core
1684
61.684981684981686%
Multi-Core
4241
24.629769440734073%
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
