Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E-2336 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 852 days newer than Xeon E-2336.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E-2336 - 190 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2336 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2336 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2336
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2336 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
