Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E-2356G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 491 days newer than Xeon E-2356G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2356G
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 10% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E-2356G - 233 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2356G - 32 vs 12 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2356G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2356G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
