Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600T outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600T is 3872 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600T
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 155 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-14600T
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
