Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4663 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 48% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1225 - 136 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1225
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1225
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
568
19.280380176510523%
Multi-Core
1693
10.672634432326799%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
