Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 231 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
664
22.539035980991173%
Multi-Core
2298
14.486541007375653%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
