Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3702 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 241 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 7500F
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1154
42.05539358600583%
Multi-Core
3735
29.633449698508407%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
