Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 48% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 80 vs 54 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1154
42.25558403515196%
Multi-Core
3735
23.720309919979677%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
