Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil Village than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 315 vs 292 FPS
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
22.552166934189405%
Multi-Core
1875
22.37470167064439%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
