Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 191 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
22.1346987002757%
Multi-Core
1875
13.498920086393088%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
