Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 186 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |