Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3789 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 166 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1193
38.384813384813384%
Multi-Core
3874
18.41079745271362%
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 82 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
