Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2781 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 193 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
