Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1620 - 200 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
600
21.96997436836324%
Multi-Core
2238
14.213133494220752%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
