Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 232 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1171
38.77483443708609%
Multi-Core
5305
29.036672140120416%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
