Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 3607 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 241 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
651
23.109691160809373%
Multi-Core
3994
24.228086138914165%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
