Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3038 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 203% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 88 vs 29 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
651
25.640015754233954%
Multi-Core
3994
28.754499640028797%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
