Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2440 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5-2440 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 112% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 87 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2440 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2440 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
285
9.190583682683005%
Multi-Core
1889
8.995238095238095%
Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
