Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3611 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 72% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 258 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 7500F
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
12.755102040816327%
Multi-Core
998
7.9181212313551255%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
