Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-14600K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
12.47327156094084%
Multi-Core
998
6.203767016845901%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
