Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 196% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 269 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
14.846538187009278%
Multi-Core
2118
12.823928311939936%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
