Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 594 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
628
20.79470198675497%
Multi-Core
3278
17.941981390257254%
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
