Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3420 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 262% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 362 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
518
16.682769726247987%
Multi-Core
3208
14.693354097009115%
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
