Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 256% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 324 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 32 vs 20 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
433
15.86080586080586%
Multi-Core
3142
18.24728497589872%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
