Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2660 - 580 vs 504 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
16.455696202531644%
Multi-Core
2635
18.510713031260977%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
