Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2660 - 240 vs 222 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
17.736757624398074%
Multi-Core
2635
31.443914081145586%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
