Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600T outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600T is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600T
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2660 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-14600T
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
16.986933128362796%
Multi-Core
2635
17.615991442706243%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
