Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 159 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
922
32.90506780870807%
Multi-Core
3652
22.111891499152335%
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
