Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 193 vs 172 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
559
21.00714017286734%
Multi-Core
3843
24.833602584814216%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
